Killing in the name of Justice

The first woman in 5 years is to be executed in the U.S. Does the fact that she is a woman make it significant? There are certainly far fewer women than men executed.

When considering issues such as the sanctity of life the death penalty is very contentious. Does anyone, even the state, have the right to take away the life of another person?

Few people would argue that many who are executed have committed terrible crimes and need to be kept away from the general population, but what is the purpose of the justice system?

If it is to seek revenge thenthe death penalty may well be acceptable, but if it is about justice - about making things right, can the death penalty do this?

To read more about this case click here.

Professor Keith Ward discussing Materialism and Idealism

Keith Ward: "Why There Almost Certainly Is a God: Doubting Dawkins from Metanexus Institute on Vimeo.

Keith Ward is seen here challenging the claims of Hard Materialists like Richard Dawkins, that the universe and everything in it is purely physical.

Some good notes regarding the body and soul argument can also be found here.

This would be particulalry useful for the Body and Soul module and anyone taking part in the A2 essay competition.

Near Death Experience - Proof that we have a soul?

Plato's Cave. A dated but useful re-telling of Plato's Cave Analogy.

The Case for God Part 1. Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sachs defends his faith against a number of atheists.

The Case for God Part 2. Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sachs defends his faith against a number of atheists.

Creation without God

Professor Stephen Hawking has argued, in his forth coming book The Grand Design, that the creation of the universe did not require God.

He says that the laws of physics are such that the universe could have created itself from nothing. This is a change of stance for Hawking who, in a Brief History of Time, had said that God may have a place in the beginnings of the universe.

Of course this does not constitute proof that there is no God, as some reactionaries have claimed. What it does do however is reignite the debate of the nature of the relationship between religion and science.

One may question why Hawking saw fit to mention God at all in a book about cosmological science. Cynics may suggest it was for publicity to incease the sales of his book. Even if that is the case however it is an interesting and challenging point he has made.

So where does it leave believers in God?

Fundementalist creationists will dismiss this entirely, as it contradicts the account of creation in the Bible.

The majority of Christians do not take a literal view of the Biblical creation stories however. (A discussion of different ways to interpret the Bible can be found here.)

Some may point out that we can still ask where the fundemental laws of physics, that made the universe possible, came from? Maybe God made these. There is a danger of taking a 'God of the Gaps' approach here however.

Some may point out that it has long been a popular view of God that he is not a part of the universe, he is entirley transcendant, so it is only to be expected that no physical/scientific evidence of him can be found.

Others, such as Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sachs, believe science and religion ask different questions and you cannot get answers from one discipline by studying another. "There is a difference between science and religion. Science is about explanation. Religion is about interpretation. The Bible simply isn't interested in how the universe came into being." He also described the hostility between religion and science as the "curse of our age" claiming that it is damaging to both. He suggests our religious faith is about how we interpret what we experience. For many theists the beauty of the universe, that science reveals, and our very ability to appreciate and understand it, makes more sense by believing in God.

Read more about this story here.